TSTP Solution File: SEV391^5 by Duper---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Duper---1.0
% Problem  : SEV391^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : duper %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 19:24:52 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 3.68s 3.84s
% Output   : Proof 3.68s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14  % Problem    : SEV391^5 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.15  % Command    : duper %s
% 0.16/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.36  % DateTime   : Thu Aug 24 03:46:21 EDT 2023
% 0.16/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 3.68/3.84  SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.68/3.84  SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark.p
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #0 (by assumption #[]): Eq (Not (Exists fun Xv => ∀ (Xj : Iota), Exists fun Xq => Or (cP a (h Xj) Xj) (cP Xv (k Xj) Xj) → cP Xv Xq Xj)) True
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #1 (by clausification #[0]): Eq (Exists fun Xv => ∀ (Xj : Iota), Exists fun Xq => Or (cP a (h Xj) Xj) (cP Xv (k Xj) Xj) → cP Xv Xq Xj) False
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #2 (by clausification #[1]): ∀ (a_1 : Iota), Eq (∀ (Xj : Iota), Exists fun Xq => Or (cP a (h Xj) Xj) (cP a_1 (k Xj) Xj) → cP a_1 Xq Xj) False
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #3 (by clausification #[2]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.68/3.84    Eq
% 3.68/3.84      (Not
% 3.68/3.84        (Exists fun Xq =>
% 3.68/3.84          Or (cP a (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (cP a_1 (k (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) →
% 3.68/3.84            cP a_1 Xq (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)))
% 3.68/3.84      True
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #4 (by clausification #[3]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.68/3.84    Eq
% 3.68/3.84      (Exists fun Xq =>
% 3.68/3.84        Or (cP a (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (cP a_1 (k (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) →
% 3.68/3.84          cP a_1 Xq (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))
% 3.68/3.84      False
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #5 (by clausification #[4]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 a_3 : Iota),
% 3.68/3.84    Eq
% 3.68/3.84      (Or (cP a (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (cP a_1 (k (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) →
% 3.68/3.84        cP a_1 a_3 (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))
% 3.68/3.84      False
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #6 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.68/3.84    Eq (Or (cP a (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (cP a_1 (k (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2))) True
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #7 (by clausification #[5]): ∀ (a a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (cP a a_1 (skS.0 0 a a_2)) False
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #8 (by clausification #[6]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota),
% 3.68/3.84    Or (Eq (cP a (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) True) (Eq (cP a_1 (k (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) True)
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #10 (by superposition #[7, 8]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Or (Eq (cP a (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) True) (Eq True False)
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #11 (by clausification #[10]): ∀ (a_1 a_2 : Iota), Eq (cP a (h (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) (skS.0 0 a_1 a_2)) True
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #12 (by superposition #[11, 7]): Eq True False
% 3.68/3.84  Clause #13 (by clausification #[12]): False
% 3.68/3.84  SZS output end Proof for theBenchmark.p
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------